|
|
|
Cost Savings Backup to Disk vs Tape |
|
|
|
|
Monday, 14 July 2008 |
|
The data backup industry has been rapidly making a transition from tape to disk, but are there any true cost savings of backup to disk vs tape? This is the subject of an ongoing debate in the data backup industry. Let's consider the following points about backup to disk vs tape:
- Tape based backup systems lack flexibility and simplicity. Tapes need to be rotated, media needs to be managed, and your tape hardware also must be managed and monitored. What all this typically means is that you have to pay personnel (most likely your high-paid IT staff) to perform these tasks. Backup to disk technologies, which are typically fully-automated, can reduce your human resources expenses.
- Tape-based backup systems can be tricky to set up and expensive to maintain. You will probably need an IT consultant to do this for you (no cost savings there!). The backup device and the software to go with it can be pricey. Disk-based systems are becoming increasingly affordable, and depending on the system you choose, may not require the purchase of additional software.
- Speed of recovery can also be an issue with tape backup solutions. Tapes must usually be retrieved from an offsite warehouse, then data must be located and retrieved from the tape. Today, rapid recovery of data is critical to the operational efficiency of many businesses, and inefficiencies cost us money, don’t they? Restoration from a disk-based backup is faster and more efficient.
Tape-based backup systems still work for some businesses. However, there are some very affordable disk-based backup solutions available at this time, with a variety of features that can save you money in the long run and make your backup tasks more efficient and secure. The cost savings of backup to disk vs tape will depend on many factors, so start your research by checking the table on our Backup Vendor Comparison page for the features you need.
|
|